Solar Tour - Oct 1 2022 - Small old home on a small budget

 

My home is likely over 150 years old. This area in Maple Heights, Ohio, was farmland, and this property was owned by a farmer named Theron Skeels at least in 1847, according to a Bedford map of the time - before Maple Heights as a city existed. I found farm handtools from the 1800s under the house. This old house is likely the first all-electric home, with solar panels, in Maple Heights today.

The home is under 1K sq ft, and was originally heated with a pot-belly stove in the living area, which was also used for cooking. It had no central heat/air when I moved in in 1985, and was upgraded to have ducts for natural gas in the 1980s, but we disconnected from the natural gas pipeline in 2019.

We use a 2.97kW solar system, with 9 panels on the south side of the western-style roof. YellowLite Solar installed, referred by Solar United Neighbors (a nationwide consortium that results in being able to trust the installer they pick, and lower cost). 

The idea was to cover about one-third of the electrical needs. Production, use and exported energy can be monitored on an Enphase cell phone app. The highest electric use covered to date, for one day, was 67%. 

The Enphase app allows for immediate feedback on energy use, for example if heat is turned up or down, if the washer and water heater are used, etc. It changed my energy use habits immediately, as what happened with my first Prius - using the dashboard.

This solar system cost about the same as a "beater car," at $6K bottom line or better after tax credits. If one can afford a car, one can afford rooftop solar. Three ways it pays back much earlier than just doing the simple math of bill savings over time: 1) With all-electric, in Ohio, there is no gas bill. With gas, you pay $36/mo just for the right to use the gas, before any usage costs, so $432 savings/year right there. Then there's the feedback on how to save energy via the Enphase app. My last bill was minus $5.

I also signed up for NOPEC for "apples-to-apples" on the PUCO website, and made sure I received the Maple Heights (aggregation city) rate -and asked for 100% renewable. So, what I pay First Energy is for solar and wind. I currently pay $.055/kWh, according to NOPEC last week.

If you have any questions, please email or call: LSekura@aol.com. 216-598-0113. Enjoy !  (PS - A write-up/diary about how I went all-electric is available upon request.)

=============  

Other sustainable aspects of the house / Sustainable living:

- Wash in cold water only, hang dry - no dryer used in decades

- Blinds are used in summer to keep heat out - very few times has the heat pump been used for cooling, even in weeks of 90-degree weather. Blinds lifted in winter to let heat in - greenhouse effect.

- All electric is shut off when leaving the house, except security system, water heater and fridge.

- Most clothing is second-hand. Reducing plastic, trash and recyclables is a priority. All wet trash is "composted" - thrown in a pile with tree clippings, so a plastic liner for the trash is not necessary. I put out my trash about three times a year. 

- Most food is purchased at the Shaker Square Market on Saturday mornings: locally grown/produced, organic. Most drinks are puchased in reusable containers: milk, kombucha - and free untreated water from a spring when I visit my family in PA. Working toward refillable wine, but do purchase local.

- Cleaning is mostly done with old bottled cleaners I've had for decades, or Bon Ami scrub, if needed. Most cleaning can be done with water and a resuable woven scrubber. Painting is only done if absolutely necessary.

- Due to my low-mow lawn, allowed by the city, the insect chorus at night is full, with at least 3-4 species of crickets and katydids - and cicadas in the summer because of the deciduous trees. The trees protect my house and neighbors' homes from some of the extreme weather, and save energy costs.

I don't live a perfectly sustainable life, but just continue to work toward that. It's all we can do.

============= 

SUSTAINABLE CITY:  Maple Heights, Ohio  https://citymapleheights.com/

Maple Heights is a progressive city with a progressive mayor: Mayor Annette Blackwell - the first black female mayor in our history. It is walkable, bike-able, and with stores nearby. There is a community feel, and people interact in a friendly manner - everywhere - and are open and honest.

Homes are affordable and small. A small home saves thousands not only in heating/cooling, but in property taxes (which are already pretty low), and all sorts of maintenance. 

"Maple," as residents call it, is only 12-15 minutes from downtown, and close to all main freeways, heading any direction. And it is home to Maple Heights Catering, which has been in business for decades, and is known as the best caterer in NE Ohio - and makes all its own offerings in-house.

We have a Cleveland Metropark, and other local parks, and greenspace, as well as a pretty good canopy, and the city is planting even more trees. I've been keeping a city species list, including on ebird.org, and red-shouldered hawks have nested right around the corner for years now. 

SAVE $$ - AND STOP FLUSHING FORESTS -- USE A BIDET

Stop using toilet paper, and fight deforestation and climate change. Why flush a forest ecosystem down the toilet? Better to bidet!  ßFunny video of first-time users.

Scientific American says we use 36.5 billion TP rolls each year, wasting 15 million trees, 473 billion gallons of water, 17.3 terawatts of electricity, and 253K tons of chlorine - plus packaging & shipping.

Popular globally, except in North America, bidets are healthier for your body, prevent hemorrhoids and UTIs - and are hands-free, so less spread of germs, and a blessing for those with physical limitations.

A non-electric toilet bidet attachment costs ~$40-$70 and installs in ~15 minutes.

NEONICS: YOUR HEALTH, BIRDS and BEES, and NEONICOTINOID PESTICIDES

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

With all the talk about bees and colony collapse disorder (CCD), posting the Letter to the Editor, below, from the Cleveland  Plain Dealer seemed appropriate. 

One of the many factors affecting our bees and other pollinators is also related to our own human drinking water sources. This includes the Great Lakes, which are the largest area of surface freshwater on the planet, and a main source of water for eight states and two Canadian provinces.

This blog post starts with Laurel Hopwood's LTE, then continues with excerpts from a deposition I wrote, at Laurel’s request, in July 2016.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Plain Dealer - Letter to the Editor:

By Laurel Hopwood, Ohio Sierra Club Agriculture Chair, Cleveland

Neonicotinoid is in the Great Lakes and fish and birds are at risk

Updated Jan 29, 10:14 AM; Posted Jan 29, 10:14 AM

http://www.cleveland.com/letters/index.ssf/2018/01/neonicotinoid_is_in_the_great_1.html

Fish, birds and entire ecosystems of the Great Lakes may be at risk. A new critical study revealed the presence of neonicotinoid (neonic) pesticides pervasive the Great Lakes and its tributaries.

The study comes as draft legislation is circulating in Congress that would remove requirements that the U.S. EPA consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department and the National Marine Service over pesticides' impact on threatened and endangered species. 

Neonics are the most heavily used insecticides on the planet. Exposure to these nerve poisons is linked with bee die-offs and bird population decline. Losing these pollinators can have a tremendous impact on our food supply. 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Adding some background to Laurel’s LTE, above, the following are excerpts from my deposition.

From your blogger, Linda Sekura:

“I am aware that neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam are part of a non-sustainable agricultural system that impacts pollinators, whether honeybees or native pollinators.  I am concerned about the impact to honeybees, but my main concern as a sustainability specialist and an ecologist is the impact of neonicotinoids on native pollinators and other native insects/organisms.

“I am concerned about the impacts of pesticides, in general, on any native organisms (including humans); and I am aware that neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam have the potential to move up the food chain and impact birds, including threatened and endangered species, but also many of our common bird (and other) species, which have been in decline, and that are just as important to our ecosystems and sustainable food production. We can never know the complex role of every organism in these systems all life depends on for survival.

“The EPA’s fact sheet issued in May 20, 2003, for the conditional registration of clothianidin states that “… assessments show that exposure to treated seeds through ingestion may result in chronic toxic risk to non-endangered and endangered small birds (e.g., songbirds) and acute/chronic toxicity risk to non-endangered and endangered mammals. Clothianidin has the potential for toxic chronic exposure to honeybees, as well as other nontarget pollinators, through the translocation of clothianidin residues in nectar and pollen.”

“From an ecological point of view, there are a number of stressors that negatively impact threatened and endangered (and common) species, including birds, bees, and other wildlife, such as habitat loss and climate change.  Neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam are an additional stressor to threatened, endangered and common species.  Additionally, it is not clear that those pesticides are beneficial, either as to whether the intended results are achieved, or, if achieved, with enough intended benefit to justify the unintended impacts.  There can be a timing issue as to when pesticides are applied versus when the target species of insects arrive.  In certain situations, neonicotinoid pesticides are applied to plants and seeds, but the target species may never come into contact with these plants and seeds.  And, since neonicotinoid pesticides are persistent, many nontarget species, including diverse pollinators, but also a multitude of above- and below-ground organisms will likely come into contact with plants and seeds, and the soil and water the pesticides will leach into, and these other nontarget organisms will be affected. 

“It does not matter whether neonicotinoids are the driving cause of massive bee deaths or other impacts to threatened, endangered, and common species; what is important is that the massive use of neonicotinoids formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam are affecting honeybees, native bees and other pollinators, and other wildlife, including birds, and when that is combined with the cumulative impacts of other stressors, it may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back for some of these species.

“… An Ohio farming website indicated that neonicotinoids generally are the most popular insecticides being used; neonicotinoids are applied to 135 million acres treated annually, of which 56 percent is on cotton, soy, corn, and wheat, which are crops grown on farms in Ohio.

“…Neonicotinoids formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam have been approved by the EPA for use on corn and soy, as well as lawns, golf courses, and landscaped areas.  I am concerned that massive amounts of neonicotinoids formulated with those ingredients may be, or already being, applied in areas where I live, and this may impact threatened and endangered (and common) species that I care about.  I live in Northeast Ohio, but I frequently go to Northwest Ohio because of the international migratory bird flyway.  Many of the farms in Northwest Ohio grow corn and soy.  Agriculture is already causing algae blooms in waterways, and I am concerned that neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam are being applied to the corn and soy and are then leaching into the water, which may negatively impact migratory and locally-nesting birds. 

“Neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam are highly water soluble, which may impact birds feeding on invertebrates, or diminish the amount of these food sources available.  The above-mentioned EPA fact sheet states that “[b]ased on laboratory and field studies, the available data on clothianidin show that the compound is persistent and mobile, stable to hydrolysis, and has potential to leach to ground water and be transported via runoff to surface water bodies.”

“I also live near many parks, playgrounds, lawns, golf courses and landscaped areas where I am told that neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam may be applied.  In Northeast Ohio, most of the population lives within walking or biking distance of a park or golf course, where these pesticides could be applied.  In Northwest Ohio most live within walking or biking distance of a farm. There are at least six golf courses within a 30 minute drive from my home.”

“…It has been explained to me that the EPA was required to consult the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) prior to approving and registering neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam, since most pesticides, and in particular neonicotinoids, are shown to cause harm to the environment and wildlife.  To argue that neonicotinoids are not a driving cause of this harm does not justify their approval without meticulous review.  When more than one or two stressors already exist, the likely danger of adding to the cumulative impact neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam should be apparent.  A smoking gun should not be the threshold for determining whether consultation is required.

“…In sum, I am concerned about the threats to endangered, threatened, and common species, and the natural processes and ecosystems they (and we) depend on for survival - and professional, recreational, and personal interests for myself, my family, and fellow coworkers and citizens, as a result of  the EPA’s decision to register and maintain neonicotinoid pesticides formulated with clothianidin and thiamethoxam, especially considering that the EPA did not consult the FWS prior to approving the pesticides, and that there does not appear to be an adequate risk assessment and public review process in place.”

ONLY YOU CAN STOP SHUTDOWNS AND GRIDLOCK

                                                     Photo: Martin Falbisoner, Wikimedia: Creative Commons 

Here’s a good strategy in 2018 to stop the gridlock in Congress, get affordable healthcare and clean energy, keep the economy strong, and have your best shot at world peace:

Make sure the political party that cares most about your economic future is in the majority. You can probably do that by voting as many Democrats into office as possible - at all levels. See if you agree after reading this:

Dems have long been on the right side of history (on the forefront of equal rights, warning about climate change for decades, etc.), and we have usually all benefited when they were in control of the decisions. One shining example is the Bill Clinton budget surplus (from raising taxes on those with the highest incomes, by the way), when Dems controlled both houses of Congress.

This most recent shutdown, and shutdowns in general, are mainly due to some major unresolved policy. This recent shutdown was based in immigration. The previous time, it was Obamacare, which still isn’t perfect; but the Democrats were proven right when they predicted that Obamacare would save us billions and make life better for tens of millions that needed it most.

Their actions show that Democrats lead from empathy. Their current and historical voting records consistently show the highest propensity for equality and a healthy environment for all (LCV.org). Republican voting records are at the lowest end for these priorities, as well as for taxes (which we need, to provide benefits) and regulations (which should instead be labeled “protections”). Republicans imply that taxes and regulations are job killers.

What creates jobs is the middle- and low-income folks spending money, creating demand for goods. So, they need the biggest tax cuts. “Trickle down” (tax breaks to the rich) has been proven not to work. Our money is given to those already rich, hoping they will create more jobs, but research shows they keep most of it instead. This failed “trickle down” strategy has been used by several previous Republican presidents, and our current one.

Democrats have warned against “trickle down” for decades - and against Republican strategies in the recent tax bill, which all Dems voted against. Republican leaders front-loaded the benefits for middle-income folks, so we may (temporarily) see more money in 2018 paychecks, which could sway us to vote for Republicans in the 2018 midterms. One “gotcha” comes later, when lack of funds can be an excuse to gut benefits such as Social Security and Medicare.

Republican leaders also invoke fear of immigrants, claiming a burden on the economy and increased crime, although the evidence does not support this. The “DACA kids,” although brought to the U.S. illegally, did nothing wrong. Parents are being torn from families and deported, as Democrats try to keep families together.  Building a wall will cost us billions, will not keep people out, and is money better spent on positive solutions. 

So, if you believe that Dems forced the shutdown, also believe they laid their reputations on the line to protect DACA children, after Trump reneged on deals promised. Republican leaders responded by using the Dems’ empathy against them, in ads and sound bites. Is this leadership? And was it in America’s best interests when Republicans used their majority to set up voting districts so that Democratic votes don’t count as much (FairDistrictsOhio.org), or when they purged voters?

The bottom line:  Only you can prevent D.C. shutdowns and gridlock. Step one: Vote the Dems in; it’s our only hope to achieve step two: Fix the system while pushing for policies for the people, such as a living wage, clean power, and universal health care. These are bipartisan benefits. So is the economic growth that started during the Obama era.

If you’re not convinced yet, research candidates’ historical actions and voting records (not their ads) before going to the polls, and ask your friends to do the same. But it may be easier to just make a list of Democrats to bring with you. Or maybe run for office yourself (check out RunForOffice.org, Ballotpedia.org, Crowdpac.com, RunForSomething.net).

ELECTIONS - DOES IT MATTER WHETHER WE VOTE DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN?

NOTE: This posting has been updated from a 2014 blog, posted just before that election. The content is still appropriate in 2017, although the data is still from 2014.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The answer is simple:
The most important action anyone can take to save the planet and move the country forward is to vote.

But it is likely equally important to vote into office as many Democrats as possible (and the small handful of Independents - they usually align with Democrats). This may sound biased and extreme, but...

Over the years a far radical right is increasingly gaining control of the Republican party and creating gridlock, refusing to let beneficial policies move forward, or even to be brought up for a vote at times. Republicans who are moderate are now few or are being controlled by this radical element.

The bottom line is this (with much evidence to back this up):
1) Most Democrats in Congress have demonstrated the sincere motivation of helping all, and protecting our environment. They show that in their actions – their voting records, which are on-line*.

2) These records also show that most Republicans in Congress act in the best interests of the powerful/wealthy - and vote against the environment (with one green-leaning exception - see below).

The evidence:
The League of Conservation Voters compiles “report cards,” on environment-related voting. In 2012**:
- The majority (183) of Democrats scored 77%-100%.
Only 9 scored below 50%.
- The majority (227) of Republicans scored 0-29%.
Only one scored above 46%. That was a Senator from Maine, with 71%, and now at 69%.

As for helping the average citizen: On the 2013 vote to merely discuss extending unemployment benefits, all voting Democrats voted “Yes.” The majority of Republicans voted “No." On an actual vote to extend the benefits, a Republican majority also voted "No," and they won.

In 2013 Congress voted on the “budget extension” (really the “government shutdown”). A Republican majority would not pass a budget that included funding for Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act). All voting Democrats voted to keep the government going, but the Republicans held more elected seats - and won the shutdown.

The shutdown cost our economy billions of dollars. The alternative budget that House Republicans proposed included deep cuts to social safety nets, college student grants, infrastructure spending and more.

They have also killed minimum wage increases, and supported higher tax breaks for the wealthy. But helping those in need is what boosts the economy. Spending by the middle-class creates jobs. This is proven; and “trickle-down” by giving benefits to the wealthy instead has proven not to work. Helping low-income citizens directly allows them into (or back into) the middle-class, boosting spending and jobs.

Another strategy has been to sabotage any initiatives that may make President Obama or Democrats look good (even if it's something the Republicans previously said they want, or would benefit them), then blame the Democrats when nothing is accomplished. President Obama calls this “obstructionist tactics.”

24 states (all with Republican governors and/or legislatures) refused billions in federal support for Medicaid expansion for their lowest income citizens, resulting in many with absolutely no medical coverage; hospital closures; and predicted rising premiums for all.


WHAT'S NEEDED:
We can move the country forward greatly in upcoming elections. What we need is our 3 main decision-making offices to be led by Democrats (President, Senate, House).

What we need is a large number of Democrats (and Independents) casting their ballot in the first place. Unfortunately, records show that Democrats don't usually show up for midterm (non-presidential) elections, which is what we will have in 2018.

In midterm elections, all 435 seats in the House and a number of the 100 seats in the Senate are “up for grabs” - as are state governors' seats, attorneys general and other key offices (also best for all if filled by Democrats). So it's a big opportunity, for both sides.

To complicate things, voter “photo ID” laws (and other disenfranchsement regulations) have been put in place in many states where Republicans hold a legislative majority.  These actions are known to negatively affect low-income voters (who usually vote Democratic).

WHAT WE CAN DO:
1) VOTE. (Here are voter ID laws by state, with a map to scroll over: www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx. Or call or Google your county Board of Elections to ask.)
2) Spread the word. Maybe write op-eds for local papers, post on Facebook, etc.
3) Contact Democratic candidates' offices to volunteer, or local Democratic party offices to help. (Google "Democratic Party Office" and your state, county or city name - or call 202-863-8000 with questions.)
4) Join “Get Out The Vote” efforts (Google “Get Out The Vote 2017 or 18)” or add other words, such as your town).

- Official initiatives are on this site: www.democrats.org. Visitors to this site will also be given screens at times, asking for donations, but there's no obligation to do that; involvement is the true goal. Phone: 202-863-8000
- Also, “Move-On” offers many opportunities: front.moveon.org
- Young folks (of all ages) may like: RockTheVote.com. Phone: 202-719-9910

Other Trusted Information Resources:
1) For the facts about candidates, or about any issues: MSBNC is great, especially the Rachel Maddow Show - also posted on-line for free. Libraries have computers to use for free. Go to www.MSNBC.com. Click "Explore" for topics. Or click "Watch" for Rachel's show and others (Chris Matthews, etc.).

2) For true but humorous coverage, watch The Daily Show, late nights weekly, and Samantha Bee Full Frontal on Wednesdays. For those without cable, you can watch "re-runs" online after the fact. Stephen Colbert is on regular stations.

3) When searching other websites: To check a website's legitimacy, click on their “About” link. Organizations hiding up their funding sources may not have this "About" link. Find who funds them, and who the leaders are, and their backgrounds – which should also be included on legitimate sites.


_____________
(*One source of on-line voting records: www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.)
(**Votes were only compiled here for Congress members who were still in office as of January 2014, at the time I did this work – and only if they voted. Historical report cards will also show a split between high-scoring Democrats and low-scoring Republicans. Source: www.lcv.org.)

WATER - - WHAT WE MUST DO - AND IT'S EASY

WATER = LIFE. There is a limited amount of water on this planet, and it's in short supply. Some major rivers no longer reach the ocean due to diversions for irrigation and city supplies - and for energy generation. What we each can do is simple - see the numbered list at the bottom of this post:


THE INSANITY:
Fracking for natural gas: In 2010, the EPA estimated the 33,000 existing wells used 70-140 billions of gallons of water/year. There are over 77,000 wells now, with many more to come. The water is polluted - mixed with chemicals, and is mostly removed from the water cycle - no longer available. Fracking chemicals have also leached into our underground fresh water aquifers.

Gasoline: It takes 3 gallons of water to produce a gallon of gas, and that water becomes polluted. We could make fuel directly from water instead. Hydrogen (made from splitting water) in a fuel cell can replace a gas engine. Tailpipe emissions from a fuel cell car are clean water vapor, going right back to the land. Electric vehicles charged using renewable power are an even better option. Hybrid cars could use batteries and fuel cells instead of batteries and gas engines.

Big agriculture accounts for over a third of water use. In our region, this is mostly for genetically modified corn and soybeans. 20% of our corn crop is shipped overseas, and 80% of the corn is for livestock and other feed, here and overseas. The fertilizers cause algae blooms in our lakes.

Bottled water is a multi-billion dollar business, and an environmental nightmare. Big corporations buy up water tables from under farms, small towns that can't fight back, and even in drought-stricken areas. It takes more water than what is contained in the bottle to make the bottle. Shipping from even short distances uses fuel unnecessarily.


SOME ANSWERS: Solar, wind, electric vehicles, hybrids with fuel cells instead of gasoline. All of this technology is already available. We can start moving to 100% renewable power and fuel today. We could have done this decades ago. Many developed countries are already heading in that direction.

Those who make money on oil and gas don't want policies to change, so they spend tons of money on political campaigns, so politicians don't change policies to benefit all. Same goes for big agriculture, and multinational food and beverage conglomerates.



EASY ACTIONS:

1) Vote with your wallet: Don't buy or drink bottled water (or pop, which is bottled water with unhealthy stuff added). Only buy energy efficient vehicles or hybrids - 40mpg or higher. Eat local foods - check labels or ask. Buy from (truly) local farm markets. Eat less meat.

2) Search for electric providers that have a high percentage of renewable power. In Ohio and the region, you can get 100% wind power at a good rate. Ask your electric provider for more renewables.

3) Elect Democrats or Independents, since the vast majority are pro-renewable power (and pro-environment, pro-equality). Just look at the League of Conservation Voters report cards for Congress (www.lcv.org).

4) Call your reps in DC. (To find them, click on the map at www.contactingthecongress.org.) The person answering just takes messages, so it's no big deal. Tell them you want them to:
- do whatever it takes policy-wise to work toward 100% renewable power.
- move any subsidies from oil and gas (currently billions of taxpayer dollars) to renewables, and energy efficiency incentives.

5) Simply be aware: Find what watershed you live in by Googling or calling your county's Soil and Water Conservation District. Find if there is a watershed coalition group and get on their mailing list. Google World Water Day (March 22) and look for events or initiatives. Know where your drinking water comes from by calling your city hall.

6) Inform others.

100% RENEWABLE POWER, OR KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE?

Whether or not we build the Keystone XL Pipeline is really a crossroad decision for our entire future. Do we move toward where we will (guaranteed) be forced to end up - with 100% renewable power? Or do we spend time and taxpayer money to increase fossil fuel infrastructure?

We will run out of all fossil fuels. That is a fact. So why not plan for that now, when we can reduce childhood asthma, mercury in fish, spills in waterways, and species extinction?

We can start moving to 100% renewable power right now; and this is also a fact. Most of the technology exists, and has for quite some time. The only thing holding us back is money (really government policies, which determines how money is used). Other countries have been working toward 100% renewables (Germany, Denmark, Spain, Japan and more). The U.S. will get left behind in technology expertise and infrastructure if we don't step up.

Canada producers need the pipeline to “ease bottlenecks”. But increased output is not necessary. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, over half of the energy we generate is wasted. So, implementing energy efficiency reduces the barrels of oil, and railcars of coal required.

With subsidies, the U.S. government pours billions of our taxpayer money into fossil fuels. Keystone XL will cost taxpayers at least $1-1.8 billion in subsidies, plus tax breaks, according to PriceForOil.org. We the people can tell our government office holders, who represent us, to transfer these fossil fuel subsidies to renewable power infrastructure, and energy efficient cars and buildings.

High estimates are that a pipeline can create 48,000 jobs; but once it is built, most of those jobs go away. Building the new clean renewable infrastructure equates to many more consistent local jobs that cannot be outsourced, such as installing solar panels, making buildings efficient, and rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. The expense of deploying clean power may be in the billions, but this can be billions spent on American businesses to manufacture and install, and hire more workers. Renewables and efficiency means true (local) energy independence.

Many of us have unconsciously bought into the belief that we have no control over this ingrained system. But our Constitution gives us that power. We the people vote with our pocketbooks, and with our daily decisions - and we vote in booths come November 4, 2014. Many Senate and House seats are up for grabs. The League of Conservation Voters (lcv.org) compiles scorecards for our representatives each year, to rate from 1 to 100 how they voted on environmental issues, including Keystone. We can see who is "walking the talk", so we don't have to worry about whom to believe in the TV commercials.

Plus, representatives with higher LCV voting scores (75-100) nearly always vote to support rights for the people that grow our middle class and economy, making it esier for people in adversity to spend money on goods and services: minimum wage, unemployment pay, healthcare for all. These reps also voted against shutting down the government. (Voting records are online: govtrack.us). That shutdown cost taxpayers billions of dollars. Representatives with LCV scores between 0-25 (votes against the environment) usually vote against these people's rights.

Plus, anyone can call their representatives in Congress (our lawmakers) to tell them what we want. It's easy and fast - and callers won't be requested to discuss - only to say what is desired, accept the aide's thanks for calling, and hang up. Find a House rep here (each person will have only one): www.house.gov/representatives/find. Find Senators here (usually 2 per state): www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=IL. Maybe say "I don't want us to build the Keystone XL pipeline." And "I want the US to subsidize and implement 100% clean renewable power."

There is more than one reason oil, coal and gas are called fossil fuels. They were made from ancient organisms, formed over time, so supplies will run out. We will be forced into 100% renewable power at some point; except right now, we have the chance to salvage our land, air and water; and limit extinction.

But fossil fuels are also our current legacy of fossil policies, with fossil infrastructure. We need to get on track to our ultimate future of 100% renewable power. Hedging our bets by investing in a pipeline to increase the harvest of fossil oil is just committing ourselves to a dead-end (and dangerous) infrastructure. Billions of ton of oil leaked from a pipeline in North Dakota just last year. Globally, oil spills of some type have occurred in the billions of tons nearly every year since the late '60s (see Wikipedia, "Oil Spills"). The alternatives to Keystone XL are trucks and rail, which also spill, but don't encourage a ramp-up of tar sands oil; the type of oil that needs large inputs of more fossil fuels to make it usable.

We have much better choices. It is time for us to move on to our true future; to accept the change we must make right now, without hesitation. Each time we see children boarding a school bus, we should remember the soot and toxins seeping inside and outside from diesel exhaust; and we should think about the system we are letting ourselves be locked into, even though there is absolutely no need to be.

President Obama said in his State of the Union address, "...when our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did." Let's be on the right side of history, and let our children's children remember us with gratitude.