100% RENEWABLE POWER, OR KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE?

Whether or not we build the Keystone XL Pipeline is really a crossroad decision for our entire future. Do we move toward where we will (guaranteed) be forced to end up - with 100% renewable power? Or do we spend time and taxpayer money to increase fossil fuel infrastructure?

We will run out of all fossil fuels. That is a fact. So why not plan for that now, when we can reduce childhood asthma, mercury in fish, spills in waterways, and species extinction?

We can start moving to 100% renewable power right now; and this is also a fact. Most of the technology exists, and has for quite some time. The only thing holding us back is money (really government policies, which determines how money is used). Other countries have been working toward 100% renewables (Germany, Denmark, Spain, Japan and more). The U.S. will get left behind in technology expertise and infrastructure if we don't step up.

Canada producers need the pipeline to “ease bottlenecks”. But increased output is not necessary. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, over half of the energy we generate is wasted. So, implementing energy efficiency reduces the barrels of oil, and railcars of coal required.

With subsidies, the U.S. government pours billions of our taxpayer money into fossil fuels. Keystone XL will cost taxpayers at least $1-1.8 billion in subsidies, plus tax breaks, according to PriceForOil.org. We the people can tell our government office holders, who represent us, to transfer these fossil fuel subsidies to renewable power infrastructure, and energy efficient cars and buildings.

High estimates are that a pipeline can create 48,000 jobs; but once it is built, most of those jobs go away. Building the new clean renewable infrastructure equates to many more consistent local jobs that cannot be outsourced, such as installing solar panels, making buildings efficient, and rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. The expense of deploying clean power may be in the billions, but this can be billions spent on American businesses to manufacture and install, and hire more workers. Renewables and efficiency means true (local) energy independence.

Many of us have unconsciously bought into the belief that we have no control over this ingrained system. But our Constitution gives us that power. We the people vote with our pocketbooks, and with our daily decisions - and we vote in booths come November 4, 2014. Many Senate and House seats are up for grabs. The League of Conservation Voters (lcv.org) compiles scorecards for our representatives each year, to rate from 1 to 100 how they voted on environmental issues, including Keystone. We can see who is "walking the talk", so we don't have to worry about whom to believe in the TV commercials.

Plus, representatives with higher LCV voting scores (75-100) nearly always vote to support rights for the people that grow our middle class and economy, making it esier for people in adversity to spend money on goods and services: minimum wage, unemployment pay, healthcare for all. These reps also voted against shutting down the government. (Voting records are online: govtrack.us). That shutdown cost taxpayers billions of dollars. Representatives with LCV scores between 0-25 (votes against the environment) usually vote against these people's rights.

Plus, anyone can call their representatives in Congress (our lawmakers) to tell them what we want. It's easy and fast - and callers won't be requested to discuss - only to say what is desired, accept the aide's thanks for calling, and hang up. Find a House rep here (each person will have only one): www.house.gov/representatives/find. Find Senators here (usually 2 per state): www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=IL. Maybe say "I don't want us to build the Keystone XL pipeline." And "I want the US to subsidize and implement 100% clean renewable power."

There is more than one reason oil, coal and gas are called fossil fuels. They were made from ancient organisms, formed over time, so supplies will run out. We will be forced into 100% renewable power at some point; except right now, we have the chance to salvage our land, air and water; and limit extinction.

But fossil fuels are also our current legacy of fossil policies, with fossil infrastructure. We need to get on track to our ultimate future of 100% renewable power. Hedging our bets by investing in a pipeline to increase the harvest of fossil oil is just committing ourselves to a dead-end (and dangerous) infrastructure. Billions of ton of oil leaked from a pipeline in North Dakota just last year. Globally, oil spills of some type have occurred in the billions of tons nearly every year since the late '60s (see Wikipedia, "Oil Spills"). The alternatives to Keystone XL are trucks and rail, which also spill, but don't encourage a ramp-up of tar sands oil; the type of oil that needs large inputs of more fossil fuels to make it usable.

We have much better choices. It is time for us to move on to our true future; to accept the change we must make right now, without hesitation. Each time we see children boarding a school bus, we should remember the soot and toxins seeping inside and outside from diesel exhaust; and we should think about the system we are letting ourselves be locked into, even though there is absolutely no need to be.

President Obama said in his State of the Union address, "...when our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did." Let's be on the right side of history, and let our children's children remember us with gratitude.